Some of the references won’t make sense for the modern youngster (do kids even know who Bill Murray is anymore?). It’s corny, a little weird and sort of dated if you’re watching it in 2021. Still, there are some amusing bits of business, and it’s quite a sight to see Michael Jordan bounced around by the aliens as he is literally rolled up into a ball.įor “Space Jam,” I definitely lean more toward the audience score when it comes to my review. However, he ultimately wrote that the film had a weak script.Īnd why do we have to have jokes about spitting and flatulence and other vulgarisms in a movie aimed at children? Chris Hicks, a longtime Deseret News columnist, entertainment editor and movie critic, wrote about the film.Īnyway, he said the film was “actually not a bad idea, and there are some funny bits of business along the way” and was “technically dazzling.” I decided to dig up our old review of “Space Jam” from the original release. So what did the Deseret News think of ‘Space Jam’ originally? Both films were knocked for the same reason. and products, rather than tell an interesting story or be an inspiration to children. Still, it’s interesting the major criticisms of both films surround the same point - “Space Jam” and “Space Jam: A New Legacy” are films that are meant to market Warner Bros. So clearly the film resonated with audiences rather than reviewers. The audience score on Rotten Tomatoes for the movie reached 63% based on more than 250,000 ratings. “Space Jam” hit a little better with audiences, though. Similarly, Ryan Gilbey, of The Independent, wrote in 2011 about the film’s connections to its marketing attempts, saying “Space Jam is nothing if not a product made by men who gauge a film’s success by how many soft toys it spawns.” “Space Jam is so obviously a work of the marketing/demographic-hunting mentality that it’s rather surprising to find that the brazen creature gathers a certain charm as it rolls along,” wrote Kevin Jackson of Independent Sunday in October 2011, which was 16 years after the release. Critics blasted the film for being too catered to NBA fans and Looney Tunes, calling the film a cash-in moment for Warner Bros. Most ’90s kids were obsessed with the movie because it combined the love of Jordan and basketball with the cartoon heroes of the Saturday morning television-viewing ritual.īut all these years later, the question still remains: Was the original “Space Jam” good? What the reviews saidĬritics didn’t necessarily love the original “Space Jam.” The film has a 44% of Rotten Tomatoes based on 80 reviews, which is barely better than the new film’s score. There’s definitely some nostalgia for the original “Space Jam.” It came out at a time when Jordan was a mega-world star and the NBA was beginning to grow exponentially in the United States. One review compared it to the bad sequels and reboots of the past, such as “Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2” and “Little Fockers.” Critics slammed the film for being too much of a commercial for Warner Bros. The film has a 36% on Rotten Tomatoes right now based on 97 reviews, which is a solid sample size. So far, “Space Jam: A New Legacy” hasn’t done well in terms of critical reviews. Naturally, the film will draw comparisons to the original “Space Jam,” which starred NBA legend Michael Jordan, who teamed up with the Looney Tunes to take on other NBA legends from the time of the film’s release. There’s so much “Space Jam” hype this weekend because “Space Jam: A New Legacy” - which stars NBA legend LeBron James and the Looney Tunes - is available for everyone to watch in theaters and on HBO Max.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |